<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari 4 is Faster Than Firefox, Internet Explorer, Flock, Opera and Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kokeytechnology.com/internet-technology/safari-4-is-faster-than-firefox-internet-explorer-flock-opera-and-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kokeytechnology.com/internet-technology/safari-4-is-faster-than-firefox-internet-explorer-flock-opera-and-chrome/</link>
	<description>Computer Tips, Gadgets, Technology News, Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bappy</title>
		<link>http://www.kokeytechnology.com/internet-technology/safari-4-is-faster-than-firefox-internet-explorer-flock-opera-and-chrome/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>bappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kokeytechnology.com/?p=1459#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>actualy I never tried this. let me download</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actualy I never tried this. let me download</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.kokeytechnology.com/internet-technology/safari-4-is-faster-than-firefox-internet-explorer-flock-opera-and-chrome/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kokeytechnology.com/?p=1459#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>New Safari 4.0 uses a lot of RAM sources, &gt;&gt;200MB when starting the browser and sometimes it reaches &gt;&gt;400 when many windows are in use. Conclusion: It&#039;s not worth it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Safari 4.0 uses a lot of RAM sources, &gt;&gt;200MB when starting the browser and sometimes it reaches &gt;&gt;400 when many windows are in use. Conclusion: It&#8217;s not worth it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.kokeytechnology.com/internet-technology/safari-4-is-faster-than-firefox-internet-explorer-flock-opera-and-chrome/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kokeytechnology.com/?p=1459#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>I agree that Safari is faster than firefox but it doesnt have addons and extensions as much as firefox. I can still work better in Firefox than in Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Safari is faster than firefox but it doesnt have addons and extensions as much as firefox. I can still work better in Firefox than in Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
